- Posts by Stephen R. Kleinman
Member of the FirmWhen hospital and physician leadership need advice on a broad array of medical staff, credentialing, peer review, and quality improvement issues, they turn to attorney Steve Kleinman.
His daily work includes advising hospitals ...
Background
On December 10, 2024, the Supreme Court of Ohio issued its decision in Stull v. Summa, a medical negligence case in which the defendants argued that Ohio’s statutory peer-review privilege protected from discovery the file the hospital maintained on a resident physician, which included, among other things, quality reviews and assessments of the resident’s clinical competency and professional conduct. The Supreme Court of Ohio decided one issue: Does the peer-review privilege in R.C. 2305.252 apply to a health care entity’s files about resident physicians?
This case arose from the medical treatment of head injuries that the patient sustained during a car crash. The patient and his guardians filed a medical negligence lawsuit against the hospital and its employed health care professionals, including a resident physician who participated in the patient’s care. The plaintiffs alleged that the resident improperly intubated the patient, causing the patient to sustain a brain injury.
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- DOJ’s False Claims Act Recoveries Top $2.9 Billion in FY 2024, but Health Care Numbers Dip—What Could FY 2025 Hold for Health Care Enforcement?
- Massachusetts District Court Applies “But-For Causation” Standard, Dismisses AKS-Based FCA Case After Evaluating Facts and Circumstances of Independent Contractor Arrangements
- Recent Developments in Health Care Cybersecurity and Oversight: 2024 Wrap Up and 2025 Outlook
- Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey Signs into Law a Sweeping Health Care Market Oversight Bill
- Second Circuit Adopts “At Least One Purpose” Rule for False Claims Act Cases Premised on Anti-Kickback Statute Violations