- Posts by Ada L. Peters
AssociateAda Peters helps health care organizations find solutions to their most complex health care regulatory and compliance challenges.
Managed care organizations, health plans, hospitals, physician practices, and manufacturers ...
On July 8, two weeks following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson that invalidated the constitutional right to abortion, President Biden signed Executive Order 14076 (E.O.). The E.O. directed federal agencies to take various actions to protect access to reproductive health care services,[1] including directing the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to “consider actions” to strengthen the protection of sensitive healthcare information, including data on reproductive healthcare services like abortion, by issuing new guidance under the Health Insurance and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA).[2]
The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to imminently issue its opinion in the case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (“Dobbs”). If the Court rules in a manner to overturn Roe v. Wade, states will have discretion in determining how to regulate abortion services.[1] Such a ruling would overturn nearly 50 years of precedent, leaving patients, reproductive health providers, health plans, pharmacies, and may other stakeholders to navigate a host of uncharted legal issues. Specifically, stakeholders will likely need to untangle the web of cross-state legal issues that may emerge.
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- HHS Reverses Its Longstanding Policy and Limits Public Participation in Rulemaking
- Sitting Atop a Telehealth Cliff?
- A Regulatory Haze of Uncertainty Continues as the Clock Ticks Toward Phase One of FDA’s LDT Final Rule
- First Circuit Joins Sixth and Eighth Circuits in Adopting “But-For” Causation Standard Under the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute for False Claims Act Liability
- New York’s Health Information Privacy Act Poised to Become the Latest in a Growing Trend of State Data Privacy Laws